Soon, You’ll Be Outed By A “Something” Than A “Someone”

the dls are shaking.
you should be.

instead of scientist finding something better to do with their brains,
like moving sidewalks or teleporting,
they made something to tell if someone is gay.
all by artificial intelligence scanning your face.
this is what a foxholer sent me from newsweek

 

Artificial intelligence can now tell whether you are gay or straight simply by analyzing a picture of your face.

Two Stanford University researchers have reported startling accuracy in predicting sexual orientation using computer technology.

Dr. Michal Kosinski and Yilun Wang, whose research will be published by the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, say that AI can distinguish between the face of a heterosexual man and a homosexual man in 81 percent of cases. For women, the predictive accuracy is 71 percent.

In comparison, the scientists say, the average human is less adept at identifying between straight and gay people purely based on an image: We are only able to guess correctly in 61 percent of cases for men and 54 percent for women.

When scientists presented the algorithm with five facial images of a single person, the accuracy increased to 91 percent for men and 83 percent for women.

Kosinski and Wang used “deep neural networks” to sample 35,326 facial images of men and women taken from a dating website.

Advanced computer analysis compared different facial characteristics and found that gay men and women tended to have “gender-atypical” features: fixed features such as the shape of one’s nose or jaw, and transient features such as hairstyle and facial hair.

The scientists then tested this idea to measure the “facial femininity” of each image, or the probability of that face being female. “The results show that the faces of gay men were more feminine and the faces of lesbians were more masculine than those of their respective heterosexual counterparts,” the study said. “Among men, the data-driven measure of facial femininity positively correlated with the probability of being gay.”

The findings advance discussion about the biological factors that may determine one’s sexual orientation. However, Kosinski tells The Economist, the research is not intended to be used to profile or “out” homosexual men and women. Rather, it is designed to demonstrate—or even warn—that technological advances can be used for such means and could pose a threat to our privacy, given that digital information is so easily accessible.

The researchers argue the “digitalization of our lives and rapid progress in AI continues to erode the privacy of sexual orientation and other intimate traits.”

when i read that the new iphones will have facial recognition,
i knew times were changing and fast.
this is what everyone wanted tho.
sooner or later,
we won’t even need to date.
we will be in full fledged relationships with our devices.
i know there are someone out there saying:

“NAW IT WON’T BE ABLE TO TELL I LIKE FOXHOLE/PIPE!
NO ONE CAN TELL I’M GAY/BI.”

i think it’s in your best interest to not go testing it out.

article cc: newsweek

Author: jamari fox

the fox invited to the blogging table.

12 thoughts on “Soon, You’ll Be Outed By A “Something” Than A “Someone”

  1. I thought this study was going to be something different, but nope, it is the same old studies that somehow lead to scientists believing that facial symmetry is a way to tell a person’s sexuality. You would be better off using gaydar lol

  2. I’m willing to bet big money it won’t work as well on black men. Our facial hair would confuse the hell out of that thing.

    1. “people of color were not included in the study, and there was no consideration of transgender or bisexual people.”

      This is from an article “The Guardian,” in reference to this specific technology.

      We’re safe. lmaoooooo.

  3. Useless fucking technology. There’s tech out there that can determine a person’s orientation, but no tech to tell me if my neighbor’s a pedophile? I think we need to re assess our priorities as a society.

  4. Sounds like bullshit to me. They haven’t even been able to narrow down a specific gene that causes homosexuality to my knowledge.

    Then what about people that are legit bisexual or polyamorous? They focusing on this shit instead of a cure for cancer or AIDS. How about you develop a facial scan for serial killers?

    Shit like this convinces me the government doesn’t want to cure anything. Population control.

    1. Agreed with the need to shift focus. This “study” isn’t productive in any way shape, or form. Finding a cure to cancer or AIDS would be revolutionary, but treatments get them their dollars so…

  5. They need to focus on developing our defenses, to make sure North Korea don’t take us out!
    Why is knowing someone’s sexuality such a priority.

  6. I would LOVE to see the results it has for someone like “Omahyra Mota”face… if they want to go with that logic for their results

"off topic", trolling, and other nonsense gets sent to my spam folder. other than that, play nice and let's discuss!