bottoms are getting f*cked when it comes to being paid in porn

being a wolf (aka top) is better?
well,
in porn better.
i didn’t realize how the full dynamics of how adult actors get paid.
i’ve heard in straight porn,
vixens get paid more money than males.
( x see it here )
in gay porn,
i assumed it was more “experience” based.
well porn fox,
armond rizzo,
had some stuff to share about getting paid in porn.
he claims those who get on top are the paid more than those on the bottom.
this is what he said via twitter,
but a quote from “pink news“…

He took to Twitter on January 26 to tell his 320,000 followers how the studio BlacksOnBoys have taken an interest in him.

But Rizzo, 29, decried the studio when he alleged that “they pay bottoms way less than tops”.

He added: “And [their] excuse [is that] the site is more top-dominant.

Rizzo initially didn’t name the studio, but later disclosed that his allegations are pinned at BlacksOnBoys.

“Such a shame,” he said, “lost my respect.

“For BlacksOnBoys if you’re wondering what my response is to working for you, I think you’re smart enough to know that it’s going to be a big NO THANKS!

“I don’t care that you even raised my fee up. It’s just unjust you pay bottoms less and for that I decline working for you!”

The performer’s public accusations sparked debate online, prompting him to broadcast a Twitter live video titled “Tops vs Bottoms”.

In the lengthy video, he gave a candid account of the demands that the two preferences face in the adult film industry, but elaborated on the notable differences.

Rizzo described in detail how the two positions are judged differently, arguing that tops are afforded particular privileges, especially in the porn industry.

He emphasised that, traditionally, tops spend less time getting ready for shoots whereas bottoms must prep comparatively more and even monitor what they eat.

I’m getting very passionate because I have literally had to do all the work on set,” Rizzo said.

And all the top had to do is lay there and watch the bottom bounce and do all the f***ing work”.

[The bottom] as well, has to hold their own weight, so you’re light as a feather, so the top looks big and masculine.

His allegations provoked fury from followers, with fellow adult film stars providing their own accounts of the pay gap between tops and bottoms.

hmm.
well trust me,
it’s not easy to be a fox.
if i wanted to get smashed right now,
unlike vixens,
i’d have to go prepare my tail for feasting and penetration.
wolves have the luxury of just showing up and pulling their meat out.
God forbid they go deep and you shit on them,
it would be the end of the whole world.
i’d imagine because of alla that,
we would be paid more “just because“.

it’s weird because back then,
i’d see some “wolf” performers becoming “foxes”.
that use to bug me.
wolf today; fox tomorrow.
mustang was ( x one of those ).
i did get turned on watcng rio bang him cross eyed tho.
speaking of,
what happened to rio?
he instantly turned me on when i watched scenes with him.
he has natural sex appeal.

deangelo jackson has been ( x on the bottom ) for quite a few scenes recently.
most of the times,
you can tell they are “fox for pay“.
as soon as they get into a certain position and their cheeks spread

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

“oh hi.”

it’s interesting that armond is spreading light on this.
i don’t know much about the porn besides i use it to get off.
hopefully it can get equal pay in the porn community,
although since “onlyfans” has taken over,
i think folks are fuckin’ to their own rules than with studios.

article cc: pink news

Author: jamari fox

the fox invited to the blogging table.

28 thoughts on “bottoms are getting f*cked when it comes to being paid in porn

  1. It all depends on the site and how they pay. Cocodorm used to pay their models a certain low fee but if they have a name they will pay top money. However some of the models used to claim they didn’t even get paid. They claimed their fees took their paycheck. Meaning while they were living in the house their food, rent, utilities and misc were deducted from their paycheck. Things may be different now but it definitely depends on the company or site and how they pay their models. With the rise of Onlyfans and Connectpal, you see a lot of porn stars switch to independent and do their own scenes.

    1. Khi Lavene and Rhyheim Shabazz seemed to always get a bag with their content. Rhyheim a international porn star fucking in Brazil, Paris and shit. Khi Lavene be fucking in cars, club restrooms, stairways, parking garages, and at his place. I remember when BreeditRaw, Dawgpoundusa, Papithugz and Taggaz was like the shit to go to or wait until somebody put it on myVidster

  2. Yikes! I definetly see this being true but whew chile I just really don’t know what to say to this while thing, I have so much to say but I’m dead af, what can I say I’m speechless while I write a whole paragraph about being so. 😣😭😂😂

  3. Along with the amount of preparation that you mentioned, bareback bottoms are more susceptible to contract an STI or STD… that alone should qualify them for equal if not more money.

  4. I’m confused without a bottom there be know top so why not demand more or keep it moving it’s your hole you decide what goes in it and what your worth I mean you getting fucked by some one you don’t like most of the time I say get a legit regular job not worth it but amature porn you run your shit ..

  5. Depends on the studio and also the quality of your…ummm “hole”. At the end of the day, porn is just a fantasy and you either versify your role or roll over and deal.

    The Black Tops are in high demand on that site sooo don’t expect to get paid more…🏃🏾‍♂️

    Yes, Bottoms have to “prepare” but the Tops have to maintain and erection during hours and cum on cue. Not dismissing the work of a Bottom or anything.

    If these walls could talk….an auditorium.

  6. You would think that because both of the people in the film are men, it would be an equal rate regardless of position but when you look at it deeper, what Armand said makes sense. Look at most of the porn stars we know and talk about. If they aren’t verse, they’re usually tops. Armand is the rare bottom that is well known. With the pay discrepancy, I don’t think that’s right. If there had to be a pay difference, it should be bottoms getting paid more. Bottoms do more in their scenes than most tops do so for tops to get away with doing little (those who don’t kiss or/& don’t suck dick or even eat ass) but get paid more that’s not right at all. I’m not a fan of Armand’s but i hope that there is a change in how gay porn stars are paid for the work they do.

    1. You answered your own question. The tops get paid more because they are almost always more well known. That’s because the consumers of gay porn are more interested in the tops. As for the no kissing or sucking dick, that’s all apart of the fantasy. The hyper masculine, straight guy turned out that don’t do that gay shit but will use your hole fantasy that so many gay men have.

  7. It’s supply and demand. As someone posted on Twitter, gay porn companies often have far more good bottoms available than good tops. While the tops have to clean out and be ready to take all kinds of D, the tops have to be able to maintain an erection, which isn’t easy for some huge D brothas and Viagra/Cialis doesn’t help, especially if you’re gay for pay and not sexually turned on by a male bottom, and then the studios want a real cum shot, which you can’t fake. I also think some discrimination against bottoms is part of the mix, though. They should all get the same fee unless they’re so popular they keep people coming back, then give them a bonus.

  8. A Top that sucks is the best kind of Top. I will admit that when I was much younger I was convinced I was a total bottom cause I was shy/quiet. I just like to please my man & do whatever I can to do that (as long as it’s not overly disgusting…)

    The types of refundable gay ideas are:

    Tops and Bottoms with odd position restraints. Tops that don’t suck or get their ass ate, bottoms that dont eat ass or get sucked…unless they have tried it a few times and found it utterly undesirable but if they don’t want to do it because it’s “position restricted” then it’s time for a refund.

    Versatile men who think all gay men need to be versatile. I would have never assumed this to be a thing had I not seen it floating around on more than one occasion. Honestly, not all gay men practice anal sex, those that do, some like to take peen and others like to give it and not the other way around. Depends. Only time I see it as an issue is if they haven’t tried it and feel like it will hinder their position and demote them.

    Some gay men just don’t like stuff in their ass, some do.

    Tops= Man
    Bottoms = Woman
    Versatile = Hoes

    That seems to be similar to how they paint these things.

    I’d like to argue that there are certainly quite a few total tops out there despite the belief there isn’t. However, not all tops are masculine, some might even be trans.

    I find it odd someone like Tank can make a claim about experimenting with a male a few times and he gets praised and its not gay but in the gay community, if a Total Top, bottomed in his past, he is suddenly a closeted bottom. 🤷🏾‍♂️

    Like people can’t change position or something or they were born a bottom or top.

    The gay porn industry is only concerned with the dominant masculine top because that what the gays and straights seem to think Tops are. Notice how most clueless heterobots wonder who is the “man and woman” of the relationship.

    Us LGBTQ people do not have to worry about all that stuff (or at least not supposed to) imo.

      1. He’s funny. Why am I up against a brick wall. My back is burning. Being scratched up” LMBAO! His voice is annoying, but he’s entertaining and has something to say.

  9. So I did some research and Ricky Larkin actually reached out to him and explained that the specific company, “BlacksOnBoys” is a black male fetish porn company that caters to white gay men who are attracted to the black dl thug archetype. In so many words, because of this, Larkin suggests that the tops should be compensated more Because they are the draw to the site. Not the bottoms. Rizzo flipped out on him. He is omnipresent in the world of gay porn so yes he is in demand but may not be getting more close attention than a new up and comer. I’ve also heard he is very nasty towards other bottoms in the industry. I can understand in a way but I mean it is a sexual preference at the end of the day. It is not as if you’re Physically incapable of topping or bottoming. Just my view.

  10. Tops deserve to get paid more. this is economics 101. Your pay is usually based on the value you bring to the firm. Look at this site for example. This is a site that glorifies tops and masculinity as mot gays do. That is the fantasy that is being sold. That is why tops are paid more. They are the product, not the bottoms. In straight porn women get paid more because they are the fantasy. The huge exception to this are the barely legal twinks who are the fantasy for many older men. Aromond fits into this role. If he was more masculine looking he’d have never blew up. Instead he was the small feminine looking bottom being destroyed by big dick or mature dick. As he gets older he will be forgotten unless he starts doing more raunchy things. That’s because older bottoms don’t fit the stereotype of what older tops want which is young and small. If he stays in porn another decade don’t be surprised if he grows a beard and becomes verse or he starts getting pissed on and fisted.

    When is the last time you saw anyone upset because a bottom started topping in porn. Now when was the last time you saw someone upset because a top started bottoming and ruined the fantasy that he was a total top. When was the last time a bottoms first scene topping was a big deal. Now when was the last time a top (especially a big dick top) made news for bottoming for the first time.

    Masculine tops are the product/fantasy of most gay porn. They drive the sales. That’s why they deserve more. You don’t pay your hardest worker the most money. You pay the employee who makes you the most money, the most money.

"off topic" and other nonsense gets sent to my spam folder. other than that, play nice and let's discuss!